<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Go Woody Wire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gowoodywire.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gowoodywire.com</link>
	<description>Go Woody Wire</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Ning or KickApps? Part II by Sara</title>
		<link>http://gowoodywire.com/2008/04/16/ning-or-kickapps-part-ii/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gowoody20.wordpress.com/?p=57#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Any advise for singel sign on (open source)?

Sara</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any advise for singel sign on (open source)?</p>
<p>Sara</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ning or KickApps? Part II by Petri I. Salonen</title>
		<link>http://gowoodywire.com/2008/04/16/ning-or-kickapps-part-ii/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Petri I. Salonen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gowoody20.wordpress.com/?p=57#comment-232</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the good tip... I am investigating what platform I should use for my social networking site... This gave me a few good hints and tips.

Petri</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the good tip&#8230; I am investigating what platform I should use for my social networking site&#8230; This gave me a few good hints and tips.</p>
<p>Petri</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ning or KickApps? Part II by BizMo - &#187; Ning or KickApps?</title>
		<link>http://gowoodywire.com/2008/04/16/ning-or-kickapps-part-ii/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>BizMo - &#187; Ning or KickApps?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gowoody20.wordpress.com/?p=57#comment-230</guid>
		<description>[...] Ning or KickApps? Part II « Allan Woodstrom’s Blog - Sports, Media, Technology and Politics - Min... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ning or KickApps? Part II « Allan Woodstrom’s Blog - Sports, Media, Technology and Politics - Min&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Queen Bees Helps Mean Girls by Google Trends: Anticipation is Key to Blogging Success &#171; Marketing Breakdown</title>
		<link>http://gowoodywire.com/2008/07/12/queen-bees-helps-mean-girls/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Trends: Anticipation is Key to Blogging Success &#171; Marketing Breakdown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gowoody20.wordpress.com/?p=85#comment-221</guid>
		<description>[...] couple days ago, I did a test. On another blog, I wrote about a topic with a keyword that ranked high on Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] couple days ago, I did a test. On another blog, I wrote about a topic with a keyword that ranked high on Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Excess iPod Inventory by website prices</title>
		<link>http://gowoodywire.com/2008/07/11/excess-ipod-inventory/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>website prices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gowoody20.wordpress.com/?p=82#comment-220</guid>
		<description>[...] auction website??s starting for price for the iPods is just 1. *I was compensated for this, but thttp://gowoodywire.com/2008/07/11/excess-ipod-inventory/Read "RE: Legit check on website" at Legit Check Forum Forum Hey guys im wondering if anyone has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] auction website??s starting for price for the iPods is just 1. *I was compensated for this, but thttp://gowoodywire.com/2008/07/11/excess-ipod-inventory/Read &#8220;RE: Legit check on website&#8221; at Legit Check Forum Forum Hey guys im wondering if anyone has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Blogging Killing Journalism? Or is Blog Popularity a Result of Bad Journalism? by McCain&#8217;s Dislike for Bloggers Video &#171; Allan Woodstrom&#8217;s Blog - Sports, Media, Technology and Politics - Minnesota Blog</title>
		<link>http://gowoodywire.com/2008/07/06/is-blogging-killing-journalism-or-is-blog-popularity-a-result-of-bad-journalism/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>McCain&#8217;s Dislike for Bloggers Video &#171; Allan Woodstrom&#8217;s Blog - Sports, Media, Technology and Politics - Minnesota Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gowoody20.wordpress.com/?p=79#comment-219</guid>
		<description>[...] Suggested&#160;Sites          &#171; Is Blogging Killing Journalism? Or is Blog Popularity a Result of Bad&#160;Journalism? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Suggested&nbsp;Sites          &laquo; Is Blogging Killing Journalism? Or is Blog Popularity a Result of Bad&nbsp;Journalism? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kobe Bryant vs. Shaquille (Shaq) O&#8217;Neal: A Look Back by Shaquille O&#8217;Neal vs. Kobe Bryant Part II: Shaq&#8217;s Rap &#171; Allan Woodstrom&#8217;s Blog - Sports, Media, Technology and Politics - Minnesota Blog</title>
		<link>http://gowoodywire.com/2008/06/05/kobe-bryant-shaquille-shaq-oneal-look-back/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaquille O&#8217;Neal vs. Kobe Bryant Part II: Shaq&#8217;s Rap &#171; Allan Woodstrom&#8217;s Blog - Sports, Media, Technology and Politics - Minnesota Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gowoody20.wordpress.com/?p=68#comment-217</guid>
		<description>[...] L.A. Lakers, shaq vs. kobe, shaq's rap, Shaquille O'Neal      A couple of weeks ago I wrote about Kobe Bryant and Shaquille O&#8217;Neal. Specifically how Kobe Bryant had the opportunity to make his mark on history as quite [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] L.A. Lakers, shaq vs. kobe, shaq&#8217;s rap, Shaquille O&#8217;Neal      A couple of weeks ago I wrote about Kobe Bryant and Shaquille O&#8217;Neal. Specifically how Kobe Bryant had the opportunity to make his mark on history as quite [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gen-Y: Why we love Barack Obama by Ryan Durry</title>
		<link>http://gowoodywire.com/2008/06/18/gen-y-why-we-love-barack-obama/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Durry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 02:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gowoody20.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Hey Bro, 

I this these are extremely interesting points, but I have a rather different perspective on the current political scene, and a bit of confusion about our demographic's general viewpoint that I would like to put up for discussion. Please allow me to question your comments in the interest of conversation. 

I will begin by establishing that I am a 23 year old white male web designer from the twin cities of Minnesota. I consider our "Gen-Y" demographic to be generally hard working, politically savvy, caring little about race, valuing freedom, and possessing a global perspective, as you describe. That being said, I'm confused about the success of the current crop of political leaders. 

I see Mr. Obama's economic and political view as one of extremely Marxist philosophies that I would not expect our generation to agree with. The economics of heavy government control and reduced freedom of personal property have historically never been sustainable, and it surprises me that, as both major political parties slide increasingly left, our generation has not proven more fond of freedom and personal accountability. 

Additionally, I believe our generation to be intelligent and savvy; from a marketing standpoint we are difficult to sell to because typically we can smell a sales pitch a mile away. However, this does not seem to hold true when it comes to our politics. Barack Obama is an extremely gifted speaker, but when I hear him speak or debate, he seems to dance around his actual plans for our nation, and merely delivers carefully formulated hypothetical tidbits that we want to hear. The generation that was raised on the internet should be able to hold our political candidates to a much higher level of scrutiny. 

Finally, I agree with most of your points, but vastly disagree that the current Democratic party as a whole values the elements of our demographic that you describe. (I should point out that I do not think the current Republican party is very much better in this regard. Because we are discussing Obama, I will leave my presidential candidate of choice out of this conversation, but will say that it is neither Obama nor McCain.) 

You describe Obama's ability to inspire people to work hard, but I see a party that subsidizes not working and literally penalizes success in order to gain the vote of the poor uneducated. You mention the value we put on having opportunity, but I see a candidate that seeks the Marxist idea of absolute equality over the freedom to succeed. You speak of our intolerance of special interest groups affecting national policies, but I see a congress that caters severely to many special interests, particularly in the environmental and agricultural fields. Finally, you describe the value we place on free speech, and I agree that we can no longer trust the media to do any more than sit in the laps of their politician or special interest of choice, but I see a party that cannot tolerate disagreement and feels compelled to squash any expression that they do not agree with. 

Again, I do very much agree with your analysis of our generation's general personality, but I disagree that Obama accurately represents these ideals. I certainly do not hope to offend with my alternate perspective, but do believe that a healthy discussion is needed. 

Thanks for the post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bro, </p>
<p>I this these are extremely interesting points, but I have a rather different perspective on the current political scene, and a bit of confusion about our demographic&#8217;s general viewpoint that I would like to put up for discussion. Please allow me to question your comments in the interest of conversation. </p>
<p>I will begin by establishing that I am a 23 year old white male web designer from the twin cities of Minnesota. I consider our &#8220;Gen-Y&#8221; demographic to be generally hard working, politically savvy, caring little about race, valuing freedom, and possessing a global perspective, as you describe. That being said, I&#8217;m confused about the success of the current crop of political leaders. </p>
<p>I see Mr. Obama&#8217;s economic and political view as one of extremely Marxist philosophies that I would not expect our generation to agree with. The economics of heavy government control and reduced freedom of personal property have historically never been sustainable, and it surprises me that, as both major political parties slide increasingly left, our generation has not proven more fond of freedom and personal accountability. </p>
<p>Additionally, I believe our generation to be intelligent and savvy; from a marketing standpoint we are difficult to sell to because typically we can smell a sales pitch a mile away. However, this does not seem to hold true when it comes to our politics. Barack Obama is an extremely gifted speaker, but when I hear him speak or debate, he seems to dance around his actual plans for our nation, and merely delivers carefully formulated hypothetical tidbits that we want to hear. The generation that was raised on the internet should be able to hold our political candidates to a much higher level of scrutiny. </p>
<p>Finally, I agree with most of your points, but vastly disagree that the current Democratic party as a whole values the elements of our demographic that you describe. (I should point out that I do not think the current Republican party is very much better in this regard. Because we are discussing Obama, I will leave my presidential candidate of choice out of this conversation, but will say that it is neither Obama nor McCain.) </p>
<p>You describe Obama&#8217;s ability to inspire people to work hard, but I see a party that subsidizes not working and literally penalizes success in order to gain the vote of the poor uneducated. You mention the value we put on having opportunity, but I see a candidate that seeks the Marxist idea of absolute equality over the freedom to succeed. You speak of our intolerance of special interest groups affecting national policies, but I see a congress that caters severely to many special interests, particularly in the environmental and agricultural fields. Finally, you describe the value we place on free speech, and I agree that we can no longer trust the media to do any more than sit in the laps of their politician or special interest of choice, but I see a party that cannot tolerate disagreement and feels compelled to squash any expression that they do not agree with. </p>
<p>Again, I do very much agree with your analysis of our generation&#8217;s general personality, but I disagree that Obama accurately represents these ideals. I certainly do not hope to offend with my alternate perspective, but do believe that a healthy discussion is needed. </p>
<p>Thanks for the post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mike Huckabee Commercial: Is it a Cross? by book background</title>
		<link>http://gowoodywire.com/2007/12/19/mike-huckabee-commercial-is-it-a-cross/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>book background</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 03:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gowoodywire.com/2007/12/19/mike-huckabee-commercial-is-it-a-cross/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>[...] shelf in the background was strategically lit to subliminally look like a cross?Watch the video andhttp://gowoodywire.com/2007/12/19/mike-huckabee-commercial-is-it-a-cross/bible tour ? Bible Book Background OTBible book background OT. Genesis &#38;middot Exodus &#38;middot [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] shelf in the background was strategically lit to subliminally look like a cross?Watch the video andhttp://gowoodywire.com/2007/12/19/mike-huckabee-commercial-is-it-a-cross/bible tour ? Bible Book Background OTBible book background OT. Genesis &#38;middot Exodus &#38;middot [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stephen Colbert, Social Influence and the 2008 Elections by Brandon</title>
		<link>http://gowoodywire.com/2007/10/26/stephen-colbert-social-influence-and-the-2008-elections/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 01:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gowoodywire.com/2007/10/26/stephen-colbert-social-influence-and-the-2008-elections/#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Stephen Colbert is a satirist.  It is a character, and it is modeled after pundits (like Bill O'Reily).  Basically he takes  a very aggressive stance on things to point out how ridiculous they really are.  
Sheesh. Now I know why people in this country are worried about our education standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen Colbert is a satirist.  It is a character, and it is modeled after pundits (like Bill O&#8217;Reily).  Basically he takes  a very aggressive stance on things to point out how ridiculous they really are.<br />
Sheesh. Now I know why people in this country are worried about our education standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
